Are Your Premises Safe?

If you have dangerous or hazardous conditions on your property, it would be wise to know the ins and outs of premises liability before someone injures themselves.

Basically the law of premises liability is a branch of personal injury law that covers injuries sustained as a result of dangerous or hazardous conditions on a piece of property. The major premise here is that a person who owns property – homeowner or commercial property – is (to a certain extent) responsible for what happens on that property. This means the owner is obligated to make sure the property and/or any buildings on that land are in safe condition for others.

The other name for cases in this area of law -- perhaps you don’t recognize the term premises liability -- is slip and fall cases. The bulk of cases in this area usually do deal with falls on slippery surfaces, trips over various hazards and other things, such as stairs in poor repair. It shouldn't come as much of a surprise that this area of law is connected to several others as well.

Other injuries that may be covered by the doctrine of premises liability are porches collapsing, lead poisoning, mercury contamination, elevator malfunctions or drops, stairs that collapse and property fires. No two premises liability cases are alike and each one must be considered on its own merits. However having said that, there is one common element in most of these cases, and that would be negligence. The courts need to know if a property owner or manager is liable for a plaintiff's injuries.

Proving responsibility for someone else's injuries requires three components or elements. The first is a showing of duty, meaning that the owner did know or should have reasonably known about a hazard on his or her property. The second element refers to a breach of duty, in that it must be proven that the property owner failed to act "as a reasonable person" to remove or fix the danger.

Element three is that the plaintiff must show a causal link. In other words, prove that the defendant did not follow a reasonable standard of care and that this failure was the "direct and proximate cause" of the plaintiff being injured. If you have had an accident on someone's property and want to know your legal rights, contact a premises liability attorney to discuss your situation.

Tim Anderson works with Atlanta Personal Injury attorney, Stephen M. Ozcomert. The firm specializes in personal injury, malpractice, motorcycle accidents, and wrongful death. To learn more about Atlanta personal injury lawyer, Stephen M. Ozcomert or Atlanta personal injury, Atlanta personal injury lawyer, Atlanta personal injury attorney, visit Ozcomert.com.

Surgical Malpractice

Having an operation ranks as number one on a list of things people would rather not do. There is an enormous amount of trust placed in the hands of a surgeon, and one hopes there are no surgical errors.

It's tough enough to get up the courage to face major surgery without also having to worry if the surgeon is in top form and able to do the job. Unfortunately however, surgical medical malpractice results in approximately 98,000 deaths a year. These statistics, courtesy of the Institute of Medicine, further suggest that total does not include patients who have wound up with life altering injuries due to surgery.

What is surgical medical malpractice? Most commonly it is the result of a surgeon failing to give their patient proper care, and that failure ends up causing serious injuries or death. Typically, this would have to do with a surgeon not adhering to accepted medical standards or not properly utilizing their skills.

Sadly, surgical medical malpractice is often due to very simple errors that should not have occurred had the surgeon been paying close attention to the surgical field, things such as using improperly sterilized instruments, a wrong incision, the puncture wound or a cut to an organ, anesthesia errors, surgery on the wrong organ or side, and instruments left inside a patient on closing.

Errors during surgery are one thing, negligence in diagnosing the right kind of operation necessary is another, and that is also classified as surgical medical malpractice. The three most often encountered classifications of surgery are emergency, urgent and elective. In the case of emergency surgery, it needs to be done post haste, not delayed. Urgent surgery needs to be done within a two-hour time frame, and elective surgery may be put off for some time.

Many procedures are prone to surgical malpractice, some more so than others. The ones that seem to be the most susceptible to errors are operations involving thoracic surgery, cosmetic surgery, gastric bypass, cardiothoracic and child delivery. While it is true that surgical medical malpractice is a reality of life, this isn't to say that the majority of surgeries don't go precisely as planned, and were deemed a success.

If you suspect you have been a victim of surgical malpractice, contact a medical malpractice attorney and find out what your rights are in this situation. Your attorney will be able to advise you of how cases such as this are handled.

Tim Anderson works with Atlanta Personal Injury attorney, Stephen M. Ozcomert. The firm specializes in personal injury, malpractice, motorcycle accidents, and wrongful death. To learn more about Atlanta personal injury lawyer, Stephen M. Ozcomert or Atlanta personal injury, Atlanta personal injury lawyer, Atlanta personal injury attorney, visit Ozcomert.com.

Unusual Defective Products Resulting in Personal Injury

The last thing one would think of causing serious personal injuries is a laptop computer. Nonetheless, a defective product is a defective product, no matter what it happens to be.

Every year thousands of Americans buy products that cause them personal injuries. Every year there are also thousands of product recalls for a variety of glitches ranging from annoying to capable of causing severe harm or death.

The last thing consumers expect when they buy a product is that it will harm them, and the last thing they also expect is that a company they rely on would ever put out a faulty product. "Unfortunately, this happens a great deal with everything from medical devices to baby car seats," explained Georgia super lawyer Stephen M. Ozcomert of Atlanta.

While one gets used to hearing about vehicle recalls, toy recalls, food recalls and drug recalls, one rarely ever hears about a recall for laptop computers. "Apparently the problem was overheating which subsequently caused fires and other various injuries," said Ozcomert. Hard to imagine that happening with something so seemingly innocuous, however, technology evidently does have bad days as well.

The apparent source of the problem was the rechargeable battery that got too hot, hotter than the normal operating temperature of the machine. "Most of the injuries that resulted from this disturbing development were personal burns, however, there were instances when the computer was left on and no one was using it. The battery overheated and started a fire," outlined Georgia super lawyer Stephen M. Ozcomert of Atlanta.

While there have been more recalls since this was first discovered, the focus of the recall events has been a certain laptop battery used in the computers. The battery in question managed to garner a fair amount of negative press during a Sony major laptop battery recall.

Certainly there are things that may go wrong with any of the equipment we use during the day. "However, the real question in this instance deals with the manufacturer of the defective battery who knew (or should have known) it had the potential to harm people," added Ozcomert.

Proving that the battery manufacturer did have knowledge of the faulty battery is not always an easy thing to do. It would involve, at the very least, the company having received complaints from other laptop users about the battery, and then doing nothing about it, unless however, they were motivated to do something later.

"Defective product law is challenging to say the least, and often the trail followed to get to the end of the story involving negligence on the part of someone in the chain from manufacturer to retailer is quite interesting. In cases such as this, the smart move is to hire a defective product attorney with an excellent track record in this area," said Georgia super lawyer Stephen M. Ozcomert of Atlanta.

To learn more about Atlanta personal injury lawyer, Stephen M. Ozcomert or Atlanta personal injury, Atlanta personal injury lawyer, Atlanta personal injury attorney, visit Ozcomert.com.

The Blame Game

Proving who is at fault in a premises liability case is sometimes quite difficult.

At the very heart of the matter of premises liability law is the question "Who is to blame?" This isn't the easiest thing to figure out, and that is why many premises liability lawyers will comment that each and every case is unique and has very little in common with any other case of the same nature. The circumstances of the case are what tend to make each one different.

"In a nutshell, the concept of premises liability boils down to this: a person who owns or occupies land (controls it) is responsible to make sure that the land is safe and hazard free for other people," explained Georgia super lawyer Stephen M. Ozcomert of Atlanta.

This also isn't easy when those slip and fall accidents happen right out of the blue. For instance walking down the sidewalk in front of a merchant's store and accidentally tripping over a broken piece of pavement, or while in the hair dresser's shop, someone slips on a pile of freshly clipped hair lying on a linoleum floor.

These seem like accidents that could have been avoided if only the owner of the premises had done something to warn customers about a hazard (cut hair on a linoleum floor) or had fixed an accident waiting to happen (the broken pavement). "If there had been a sign that warned customers about the hazards of slipping on cut hair, and someone wasn't paying attention, it's questionable whether or not there would be grounds for a lawsuit," added Ozcomert.

This is where hiring a premises liability lawyer comes into play. They are there to help those who feel they have been a victim of a slip and fall injury by explaining the concept of negligence and liability. Only a skilled premises liability attorney is able to ascertain if there is a case worth pursuing.

"If there is a case and it proceeds to court, one of the things the court takes into consideration is how long an unsafe condition existed and if the owner was careless in leaving it unrepaired," said Ozcomert. They also look to see if the owner did have posted warnings on the premises and they were ignored. The other component of a court's assessment of a slip and fall case is whether or not the person who sustained the injuries was a reasonable person.

"Being a reasonable person in part means the plaintiff was not trespassing on the owner's property or wasn't doing something they were not supposed to do on that property. In other words, the victim's own actions play a big part in the disposition of a slip and fall case," outlined Georgia super lawyer Stephen M. Ozcomert of Atlanta.

To learn more about Atlanta personal injury lawyer, Stephen M. Ozcomert or Atlanta personal injury, Atlanta personal injury lawyer, Atlanta personal injury attorney, visit Ozcomert.com.